The LinkedBlockingDeque does not behave consistently with other concurrency components. If we call putFirst(), putLast(), takeFirst(), or takeLast() with a thread that is interrupted, it does not immediately throw an InterruptedException, the way that ArrayBlockingQueue and LInkedBlockingQueue does, because instead of lockInterruptibly(), we call lock(). It will only throw an InterruptedException if the queue is full (on put) or empty (on take). Since interruptions are frequently used as a shutdown mechanism, this might prevent code from ever shutting down.
------------- Commit messages: - Added test to check that putFirst(), putLast(), takeFirst() and takeLast() all throw InterruptedException immediately if the thread is interrupted. - Used lockInterruptibly() to cause InterruptedException if thread is already interrupted when putXXX() and takeXXX() are called Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23464/files Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=23464&range=00 Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8349543 Stats: 74 lines in 2 files changed: 58 ins; 0 del; 16 mod Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23464.diff Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23464/head:pull/23464 PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23464
