On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 14:04:54 GMT, jyxzwd <d...@openjdk.org> wrote: >> Use the built-in file system provider rather than the custom file system >> provider. >> Add "public static FileSystemProvider create" method in >> DefaultFileSystemProvider which is from java8API to be compatible against >> runtime. > > jyxzwd has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional commits > since the last revision: > > - 8331467: Fix JDK-8331467 ImageReaderFactory can cause a > ClassNotFoundException if the default FileSystemProvider is not the > system-default provider > - Revert "8331467: Fix JDK-8331467 ImageReaderFactory can cause a > ClassNotFoundException if the default FileSystemProvider is not the > system-default provider" > > This reverts commit 318888339bdc2ee6a632e4850a980d91bff79e79.
I don't think we should be doing this. Did you try the direction of checking the defining class loader that I outlined in the previous comment? ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21997#issuecomment-2488690052
