On Sun, 22 Sep 2024 17:04:24 GMT, ExE Boss <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Do some refactoring so that the code can be inlined by the C1/C2 optimizer.
>> 
>> 1. DirectClassBuilder::build codeSize 361 -> 315
>> 2. DirectCodeBuilder::writeExceptionHandlers codeSize 183 -> 31
>> 3. BufWriterImpl::writeIndex codeSize 62 -> 37 (forceinline)
>> 4. BufWriterImpl::writeU2 (forceinline)
>> 5. Util::writeAttributes codSize 45 -> 40 (forceinline)
>> 6. Util::writeList codSize 47 -> 42 (forceinline)
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/classfile/impl/DirectClassBuilder.java
>  line 207:
> 
>> 205: 
>> 206:         // Now we can make the head
>> 207:         head.writeLong(((long) ClassFile.MAGIC_NUMBER) << 32 | 
>> minorVersion << 16 | majorVersion);
> 
> `minorVersion` needs to be cast to a `long` first, as otherwise when the MSB 
> is set after the shift, then it’ll overwrite the magic number with all 1s.
> 
> Suggestion:
> 
>         head.writeLong(((long) ClassFile.MAGIC_NUMBER) << 32 | ((long) 
> minorVersion) << 16 | majorVersion);

For clarity, I think using Integer.toUnsignedLong on the shift result is better

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21118#discussion_r1770632933

Reply via email to