On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 19:01:54 GMT, Mark Sheppard <mshep...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> I agree that we don't want to document too much here. Updated the factor to >> 1.75 (2 seems a bit high and might hide real issues), and to make the >> timeout value calculation and check less arcane - I have updated test output >> to print the range of acceptable timeout values: >> 05ed9e053865293a1938ed7bc6fe208759513813 > > 2 time is not too high, > I have presented, in the comment, a failures with the elapsed time is almost > twice the expected time > where the elapsed time is 14229 !! which is approx 1.84 * expected timeout @msheppar with the latest proposed change to set MIN_TIMEOUT to 0, then I believe the `@implNote` you suggested is no longer needed. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20892#discussion_r1755135496
