On Mon, 6 May 2024 15:20:08 GMT, Nizar Benalla <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Please review this PR that aims to add all the remaining needed `@since` >> tags in `java.base`, and group them into a single fix. >> This is related to #18934 and my work around the `@since` checker feature. >> Explicit `@since` tags are needed for some overriding methods for the >> purpose of the checker. >> >> I will only give the example with the `CompletableFuture` class but here is >> the before where the methods only appeared in "Methods declared in interface >> N" >> >> <img width="1510" alt="Screenshot 2024-05-06 at 00 06 57" >> src="https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/assets/96922791/1749a355-133b-4a38-bffe-51ac415b2aac"> >> >> >> >> and after where the method has it's own javadoc, the main description is >> added and the `@since` tags are added as intended. >> >> I don't have an account on `https://cr.openjdk.org/` but I could host the >> generated docs somewhere if that is needed. >> >> <img width="1511" alt="Screenshot 2024-05-06 at 00 07 16" >> src="https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/assets/96922791/89b92288-9b5e-48ed-8fa1-9342ea43e043"> >> >> <img width="1505" alt="Screenshot 2024-05-06 at 00 08 06" >> src="https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/assets/96922791/9aef08ff-5030-4189-a996-582a7eef849b"> >> >> <img width="1050" alt="Screenshot 2024-05-06 at 00 09 03" >> src="https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/assets/96922791/fdd75a26-0396-4c5e-8f59-a3717b7d7ec8"> >> >> >> TIA > > Nizar Benalla has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > Move security classes changes to pr18373 Just curious, what's the rationale for reverting the since tags on security default methods? ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18954#issuecomment-2096318435