On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 18:11:12 GMT, Alan Bateman <al...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> That would probably also involve taking existing documentation such as the >> note about not opening entries with "."/"..", and the POSIX permissions >> mappings? Would it make sense to split the rest of the changes in this PR >> from the zipfs changes since that's going to be a bigger undertaking? > >> That would probably also involve taking existing documentation such as the >> note about not opening entries with "."/"..", and the POSIX permissions >> mappings? Would it make sense to split the rest of the changes in this PR >> from the zipfs changes since that's going to be a bigger undertaking? > > Yes, I think it should be separated, and it would be nice to drop the changes > to jdk.zipfs from this PR. If/when this documentation is written then it > describe the "/" character and the synthesized links that are "." and "..", > which can lead to documentation that a zip file with name elements of "." or > ".." cannot be opened as a file system. Removed from this PR ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16424#discussion_r1446615201
