On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 17:21:02 GMT, Jan Lahoda <jlah...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> No. It should be left at the first preview level. > > `UNNAMED_CLASSES` should probably be removed, as I think it is fully replaced > with `IMPLICIT_CLASSES`, and I don't think there are bootstrap problems here > (unlike in `jdk.internal.java.PreviewFeature`). I would say it would make > sense to set the version to `JDK22`, although the difference is very small > given the feature is a preview and requires `-source 22` anyway. (Although we > keep the `@since` value for the duration of preview.) Changing ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16461#discussion_r1380574753
