On Fri, 8 Sep 2023 16:13:16 GMT, Per Minborg <pminb...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> This PR proposes to slightly improve some iterators of `AbstractMap`:
>> 
>> * Code reuse
>> * A field declared `final`
>> * Add missing `@Override` annotations
>
> Per Minborg has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional 
> commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Fix additional formating issue
>  - Don't use polymorphism and reformat code

With the recent changes this ends up just moving the iterator classes around 
(from anonymous to inner) and making a field final. I don't understand how 
fully splitting them (vs the previous `AbstractIterator` revision) helps 
against polymorphism, given they both would store the same `Iterator` types in 
the field (whatever the result of `entrySet` is), and the `next` method is two 
different implementations anyway, that I'd assume would be treated differently. 
Though I don't know enough about the JIT (or benchmarked this) to know if it 
does make a difference.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15615#issuecomment-1712097625

Reply via email to