On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 22:38:43 GMT, Stuart Marks <sma...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> Can I get a preliminary review of the wording for Deque.reversed()? If the 
> text is good, I'll make corresponding changes to the implSpecs of the other 
> reversed() default methods, namely those in List, SortedMap, and SortedSet 
> and then file the CSR.

src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/Deque.java line 626:

> 624:      * inverse-ordered method of this Deque. For example, the {@code 
> getFirst}
> 625:      * method of the returned view delegates to the {@code getLast} 
> method of
> 626:      * this Deque.

The description is general and using 'For example" avoids having to be specific 
about every operation.
The term "inverse-ordered" is new to this context and perhaps should be 
"reverse-ordered".
"inverse" does appear in a few other class descriptions for SequencedXXX but 
its relation to "reverse" may not be clear.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14504#discussion_r1232405338

Reply via email to