On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 02:03:51 GMT, Martin Buchholz <mar...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>>> @Martin-Buchholz Martin, how would you like to proceed with your proposed >>> wording, would you prefer a suggested edit to this PR, do a separate PR, or >>> otherwise? /cc @AlanBateman (any recommendation, Alan? thinking ) >> >> Talked me into it - I will dust off my github/skara skillz and make a new >> PR. >> >> I wonder if there's now a way to override javadoc for remove() without >> creating a new method body. > >> I wonder if there's now a way to override javadoc for remove() without >> creating a new method body. > > I thought recent javadoc features might have been useful here, but I scanned > the results from this jql: > > > subcomponent in ( "javadoc(tool)", "doclet" ) AND (resolution in ( Fixed, > Approved ) ) AND issuetype in (JEP, Enhancement) ORDER BY resolved DESC > > > and came up empty > @Martin-Buchholz @pavelrappo OTOH I see that DelayQueue _has already_ > overridden `remove(Object o)` so you should be able to modify that? Right. But remove(Object) unlike remove() doesn't consider the expiration time. Confusing! ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12729
