On Fri, 2 Dec 2022 17:06:23 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie <i...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> [JDK-8295729](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8295729) was created in an 
> attempt to remove all trailing whitespace from properties files, and enable a 
> jcheck verification that they did not come back, similar to other source 
> code. It turned out that this was not so simple, however, since trailing 
> whitespace in values is actually significant in properties files.
> 
> To address this, I have opened four bugs on different component teams to 
> either remove the trailing significant whitespace (if it is there 
> erroneously), or convert it to the unicode sequence `\u0020`: 
> [JDK-8298042](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8298042), 
> [JDK-8298044](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8298044), 
> [JDK-8298045](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8298045) and 
> [JDK-8298046](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8298046).
> 
> That leaves all the other trailing spaces, in blank lines and in the end of 
> comments. These serve no purpose and should just be removed, and is what this 
> issue concerns.
> 
> When this and the four "significant whitespace" bugs are all finally 
> integrated, we can finally turn on the verification in jcheck for properties 
> files as well.
> 
> The changes in this PR is based on 
> [JDK-8295729](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8295729), in #10792. I have 
> restored all the "delete trailing whitespace" changes, except for those with 
> significance. These changes were in turned created by  running `find . -type 
> f -iname "*.properties" | xargs gsed -i -e 's/[ \t]*$//'`.

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 4073b685
Author:    Magnus Ihse Bursie <i...@openjdk.org>
URL:       
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/commit/4073b68565f9d5283be96ee6b75bab686f076bea
Stats:     693 lines in 264 files changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 693 mod

8298047: Remove all non-significant trailing whitespace from properties files

Reviewed-by: serb, rriggs

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11491

Reply via email to