On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 13:10:02 GMT, Claes Redestad <redes...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> @cl4es Thanks for passing the constant node through, the code looks much >> cleaner now. The attached patch should handle the signed bytes/shorts as >> well. Please take a look. >> [signed.patch](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/files/10273480/signed.patch) > > I ran tests and some quick microbenchmarking to validate @sviswa7's patch to > activate vectorization for `short` and `byte` arrays and it looks good: > > Before: > > Benchmark (size) Mode Cnt Score Error Units > ArraysHashCode.bytes 10000 avgt 5 7845.586 ± 23.440 ns/op > ArraysHashCode.chars 10000 avgt 5 1203.163 ± 11.995 ns/op > ArraysHashCode.ints 10000 avgt 5 1131.915 ± 7.843 ns/op > ArraysHashCode.multibytes 10000 avgt 5 4136.487 ± 5.790 ns/op > ArraysHashCode.multichars 10000 avgt 5 671.328 ± 17.629 ns/op > ArraysHashCode.multiints 10000 avgt 5 699.051 ± 8.135 ns/op > ArraysHashCode.multishorts 10000 avgt 5 4139.300 ± 10.633 ns/op > ArraysHashCode.shorts 10000 avgt 5 7844.019 ± 26.071 ns/op > > > After: > > Benchmark (size) Mode Cnt Score Error Units > ArraysHashCode.bytes 10000 avgt 5 1193.208 ± 1.965 ns/op > ArraysHashCode.chars 10000 avgt 5 1193.311 ± 5.941 ns/op > ArraysHashCode.ints 10000 avgt 5 1132.592 ± 10.410 ns/op > ArraysHashCode.multibytes 10000 avgt 5 657.343 ± 25.343 ns/op > ArraysHashCode.multichars 10000 avgt 5 672.668 ± 5.229 ns/op > ArraysHashCode.multiints 10000 avgt 5 697.143 ± 3.929 ns/op > ArraysHashCode.multishorts 10000 avgt 5 666.738 ± 12.236 ns/op > ArraysHashCode.shorts 10000 avgt 5 1193.563 ± 5.449 ns/op @cl4es There seem to be failure on windows-x64 platform pre submit tests. Could you please take a look? ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10847
