PING: Could you review it? We want to move forward this enhancement. Thanks,
Yasumasa 2016/03/19 22:01 "Yasumasa Suenaga" <yasue...@gmail.com>: > Hi Alan, > > > I think the main issue here is to decide whether the API > > should be extended for encryption or not. > > We've discussed on the premise that we add the API for supporting ZIP > encryption. > In this context, Sherman tried to implement AES encryption extending > current API. [1] > > IMHO, ZIP encryption should be implemented as extention of current ZIP API > because encryption/decryption will process for each ZIP entries. > > According to Developers' Guide, guideline for adding new API is TBD. [2] > What should I do next? > > > Thanks, > > Yasumsa > > > [1] > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2016-January/037903.html > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/guide/changePlanning.html#api > > > On 2016/03/19 0:25, Alan Bateman wrote: > > > > On 18/03/2016 15:02, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> We (including me and Yuji Kubota (ykubota: OpenJDK jdk9 Author)) > discussed > >> about this issue from Nov. 2015. [1] > >> We heard several comments and we applied them to our patch. > >> > >> I have not heard new comment for our latest patch. > >> So I send review request for it. Could you review it? > >> > >> webrev: > >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-4347142/webrev.04/ > >> > >> Usage of new API: > >> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-4347142/webrev.04/Test.java > >> > > Yasumasa - I think the main issue here is to decide whether the API > > should be extended for encryption or not. If exposing it in the API make > > sense then I assume that alternative names to java.util.zip.ZipCryption > > needs to be explored. > > > > -Alan. > > >
