Hi Serge
This looks OK.
For
--- old/src/share/classes/java/sql/package.html 2013-12-05 15:08:50.587885460
+0000
+++ new/src/share/classes/java/sql/package.html 2013-12-05 15:08:50.435885464
+0000
Please remove the following
--------------------
Package Specification
• Specification of the JDBC 4.0 API
Related Documentation
• Getting Started--overviews of the major interfaces
• Chapters on the JDBC API--from the online version of The Java
Tutorial Continued
• JDBCTMAPI Tutorial and Reference, Third Edition-- a complete
reference and tutorial for the JDBC 3.0 API
----------------
The above links keep breaking now that we are off of java.sun.com
And I agree with roger, please use <br>
Alan, yes I can look to clean up some of the formatting crud for Java SE 9 once
we have access to the workspace
Thank you for doing this Serge.
Best
Lance
On Dec 5, 2013, at 10:31 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 05/12/2013 17:25, Serge wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> please review the fix
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/8028712/webrev.02/
>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eyan/8028712/webrev.02/>
>> for
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8028712
>>
>> This patch cleanup tidy warnings for generated html documentation, and do
>> not affect the appearance of the documentation.
> The removal of the <p> tags seems okay. The only thing that I'm not sure
> about the addition of <br/> to the package docs (is that needed?).
>
> Lance - while scanning this patch then it appears that some of the formatting
> in the javadoc comments is all over the place (java.sql.Connection is one
> example). It might be good to clean that up once the jdk9 project is open for
> business.
>
> -Alan
>
Lance Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
Oracle Java Engineering
1 Network Drive
Burlington, MA 01803
[email protected]
