On Oct 4, 2013, at 2:40 PM, John Rose <[email protected]> wrote:
> Actually it's OK: The name "coll" is defined a couple lines up by the "A
> collection adapter {@code collectArguments(mh, 0, coll)} ...", and the term
> "filter" is persistently applied to it. So I think it is intelligible as
> posted. — John
I'm fine with that.
>
> On Oct 4, 2013, at 11:34 AM, John Rose <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Yikes; good catch. I used javac -Xdoclint to find a couple typos in @param
>> also. — John
>>
>> On Oct 4, 2013, at 11:17 AM, Christian Thalinger
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> You have renamed "coll" to "filter" but the documentation still references
>>> "coll" in multiple places, e.g.:
>>>
>>> + * If the filter method handle {@code coll} consumes one argument and
>>> produces
>>> + * a non-void result, then {@code collectArguments(mh, N, coll)}
>>> + * is equivalent to {@code filterArguments(mh, N, coll)}.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mlvm-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> mlvm-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
