On Sep 16, 2013, at 9:49 PM, Mike Duigou <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think this is a reasonable compromise (and will be what I use for the other > cases). > OK, +1 from me. Paul. > Thanks! > > Mike > > On Sep 16 2013, at 01:13 , Paul Sandoz wrote: > >> Hi Mike, >> >> I suppose there could also be implementations of removeIf that always throw >> UOE regardless of whether an element matched or not i.e. those that override >> just to throw UOE. >> >> So perhaps: >> >> * @throws UnsupportedOperationException if elements cannot be removed >> * from this collection. Implementations may throw this exception if >> a >> * matching element cannot be removed or if, in general, removal is >> not >> * supported. >> >> Paul.
