On Aug 14, 2013, at 12:18 PM, Alan Bateman <[email protected]> wrote: > On 13/08/2013 22:18, Joe Darcy wrote: >> >> Have you seen the patch from Dan Smith which would revolve all the javac >> lint warnings in HashMap? >> >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2013-August/019618.html > My preference would be to get Doug's update in as soon as we can, mostly > because the changes are significant and it would be good to get them well > exercised (and the performance/memory characterized too) before jdk8 starts > to get locked down. I know the javac lint warnings are important but it's > lower risk and at least some of the code in the lint patch will be replaced. > I would expect it would be straight-forward to sort out any remaining issues > later. >
+1 If no one else volunteers i can try and sort this out and sync up stuff from the current HashMap/LinkedHashMap (e.g. forEachRem. as reported by Remi) and the lint warnings in one go, and submit for review. I do have a vested interest since it fixes another bug related to the incorrect reporting of splitrerator characteristics in LInkedHashMap (they should report ORDERED). Paul.
