On Jun 28, 2013, at 6:01 PM, Chris Hegarty <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for doing this Paul. I don't see anything objectionable, after a > cursory look. >
Thanks. > We can have added confidence, since the changes against lambda are much > smaller. > Plus i ran a jprt job (for this and the previous related patch) and it reported no relevant failures. Paul.
