Be careful about the "2 weeks ago" stuff... That refers to when the
changeset was created, not necessarily when it was 'pushed' into the
repository.
We need a better online way to browse the changesets.
You can try 'hg view' on your own repository, took me a while
to get that to work on my Mac, but it lets you see the changeset graph.
This blog might help:
http://blogs.sun.com/kto/entry/openjdk_mercurial_and_the_changeset
-kto
Ulf Zibis wrote:
Hi Brad,
Am 08.01.2009 04:01, Brad Wetmore schrieb:
Ulf,
Sorry for the delay, I've been working on other projects, and my
OpenJDK folder is now overflowing.
No worry about, I became earlier answer from Sherman (Xueming Shen).
So as I understand right, looking for posts like "Added tag jdk7-b40
for changeset 44be42de6693" doesn't make much sense in my case.
I'm not sure I completely understand the question.
We're currently using tags to signify each build (jdk7-b42). If you
look at the MASTER repository:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/jdk/shortlog
All the changesets that appear after that entry should be in that build.
Tag jdk7-b41 was added 2008/12/08 in this list, and jdk7-b42 _2 weeks
ago_, so according your rule above, changeset b89ba9a6d9a6, which was
published 2008/12/10, should be in b41, at least in b42, but it isn't.
That was the reason for my question.
Regarding 6642323, looks like it's now in the MASTER, but there hasn't
been a promotion yet. I'd guess it'll be b43.
I guess too, according Sherman's answer,
Thanks for your time,
-Ulf
