Dear Mirjam and Michael,

You would probably find some useful bits in a recent study of mine on behalf of the European Parliament.

J. Scott Marcus (2020), “Promoting product longevity: How can the EU product safety and compliance framework help promote product durability and tackle planned obsolescence, foster the production of more sustainable products, and achieve more transparent supply chains for consumers?”, study for the IMCO Committee of the European Parliament.
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2020/648767/IPOL_STU(2020)648767_EN.pdf

Cheers,
Scott

On 31/08/2020 18:34, Michael J. Oghia wrote:
Dear Michael,

Thank you very much for your kind words and for this absolutely critical insight. You're right that the relatively short lifecycle of many devices is indeed a primary driver of the issue.

These are such great examples as well. If it's not too much trouble for you, would you be able to add this as a comment on the post itself so that we can keep such good comments as yours centralised in one place?

I don't have much to add to your comments other than fully agreeing with you and wondering if the RIPE community can work together to lobby for changes – assuming that's something we're both able and willing to do.

Best,
-Michael
__________________

Michael J. Oghia | Advocacy & Engagement Manager
Global Forum for Media Development (GFMD <https://gfmd.info>)
Belgrade, Serbia (UTC+2) | Twitter <https://www.twitter.com/MikeOghia>|LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/mikeoghia>
GPG: E95D 2127 0D45 77D3 4D43 4D5A E3BA 6F23 301D 7082


On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 10:21 PM Michael Richardson <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


    Thank you for this.
    I think that one of the key things to reducing e-waste is to keep
    devices in
    productive use longer.  The smartphone cycle is largely being
    driven by
    planned obsolescence through lack of software updates.  While few
    of us here
    are in the smartphone business, we see the same thing with CPE
    devices.

    No software updates means poor security, which pushes for
    replacement of the
    devices.
    More capable devices can sustain more updates, but cost more up-front,
    and there still very little relationship between price paid and
    number of
    years of supported software updates.  At least, I believe this
    anecdotally.
    It would be nice if we had survey data to prove or disprove this
    belief.
    Perhaps RIPE along with some of the entities you mentioned might
    be able to
    do a confidential survey of ISPs in order to summarize the results?

    EN 303 645 and upcoming UK legislation requires that the support
    time for
    devices to be made clear at point of purchase.  See
    https://www.iotsecurityfoundation.org/keep-software-updated/ for many
    references. (Yes, I'm the presenter for the webinar, the first of
    which was
    this morning)

    While the nic.cz <http://nic.cz> Turris system is well supported,
    and very capable, I'm not
    any influence on big ISP purchasing.
    What kind of software support lifespans are ISPs able to contract?
    While many RIPE clueful people know about, deploy and contribute
    to openwrt,
    it does not seem to show up in a supported way in devices that I
    see either
    big or small ISPs deploying.  The big ones don't seem to care. 
    The small
    ones can't afford to take a risk.

    Years ago, it was the common that an ISP would buy some 12-port
    switching
    device for it's core, and two years later (when it was too slow),
    would
    migrate it from the core to an access aggregator, and then two
    years later,
    it might find a few more years service as internal lab equipment,
    or being
    used for a multi-tenant CPE.   I learnt this as a switch (chip)
    designer.
    Is this still a thing?

    In my more recent (2014-era) hands-on ISP experience, this was no
    longer a
    thing, because the devices had all become far too specialized. 
    Maybe SDN is
    changing this?  Are there best practices in making purchase
    decisions that
    support this migration of equipment?
    {I'm reminded of: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQjHJKNyoUE }

    Michael J. Oghia <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
        > I'm happy to share an article that Mirjam and I just
    published on RIPE Labs
        > about sustainable procurement practices:

        >
    
https://labs.ripe.net/Members/michael_oghia/you-ve-got-the-power-sustainable-procurement-and-the-ripe-community

        > I wanted to post it here because I think it's relevant to
    this group as
        > operators, managers, and others. I'm keen to hear your
    thoughts, and
        > encourage you to leave comments on the article so we know
    how to best take
        > this forward (and also gauge interest).

        > Have a good weekend,,
        > -Michael
        > __________________

        > Michael J. Oghia | Advocacy & Engagement Manager
        > Global Forum for Media Development (GFMD <https://gfmd.info>)
        > Belgrade, Serbia (UTC+2) | Twitter
    <https://www.twitter.com/MikeOghia> |
        > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/mikeoghia>
        > GPG: E95D 2127 0D45 77D3 4D43 4D5A E3BA 6F23 301D 7082

        > ---------- Forwarded message ---------
        > From: Mirjam Kuehne <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
        > Date: Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 2:15 PM

        > Dear colleagues,

        > Buying equipment can have an impact on environmental
    sustainability.
        > Michael Oghia writes about issues surrounding sustainable
    procurement
        > and how the RIPE community has the potential to make a
    difference:

        >
    
https://labs.ripe.net/Members/michael_oghia/you-ve-got-the-power-sustainable-procurement-and-the-ripe-community

        > Kind regards,
        > Mirjam Kühne
        > RIPE NCC

        > ----------------------------------------------------
        > Alternatives:

        > ----------------------------------------------------
        > _______________________________________________
        > connect-wg mailing list
        > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/connect-wg


    --
    ]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6
    mesh networks [
    ]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | IoT
    architect   [
    ] [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://www.sandelman.ca/       |   ruby on rails    [






_______________________________________________
connect-wg mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/connect-wg

--
J. Scott Marcus
Grossenbuschstrasse 56
53229 Bonn
Germany

Rue Royale 97 99, apartment 7G
1000  Brussels
Belgium

+49 173 5175670 (mobile)
+49 228 5349523 (fixed)
+32 2 8330556   (fixed / active only when I am in Brussels))
www.scottmarcus.eu

_______________________________________________
connect-wg mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/connect-wg

Reply via email to