Wait, what? This seems to conflict with everything I've ever read. Don't you need TWO eyes to be alive (aside from seki)?
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 8:10 AM, Robert Jasiek <[email protected]> wrote: > On 24.10.2014 17:05, Peter Drake wrote: > >> I believe A is an eye even though the stones to which it is adjacent are >> not alive. >> > > If they are not alive, then A is PART of an eye(space) of the opponent, > unless we have an anti-seki. > > > -- > robert jasiek > _______________________________________________ > Computer-go mailing list > [email protected] > http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go > -- Peter Drake https://sites.google.com/a/lclark.edu/drake/
_______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
