Hi!
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 08:18:50AM +0100, Detlef Schmicker wrote:
> Thanks a lot for sharing so much information. I am checking all your
> suggestions :)
>
> I wonder, if the biggest difference between fuego, oakfoam compared to
> pachi is not the use of progressive widening?!
>
> This might be narrowing the search very good for low number of playouts,
> but becoming useless later?!
I admit that I forgot what oakfoam uses here. I think both Fuego and
Pachi are essentially Mogo clones in these regards, i.e. using Silver's
RAVE formula and node priors (almost like progressive bias).
Petr "Pasky" Baudis
_______________________________________________
Computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
