On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Álvaro Begué <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Gabriel .Santos <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> I know that it is a lot of questions, but in order to get a computer go >> machine to outperform a human player I think that the machine should to >> ratiocinate like a human player. > > > > Do you also think a machine that carries people very fast should have > strong legs like a horse? And a machine that can fly should flap its wings > like a bird? And a closer example: Do you think the same thing about chess > machines? > > In all those cases the engineering solution to the problem was very > different from the biological solution, and I expect the same will happen > with computer go. Actually, it's already happening. > Well said. Actually, humans don't even do it the same. Each person relies on their own specific strengths and weaknesses even in physical and intellectual endeavors. Stefan Edberg probably would have never been number 1 if he decided not to volley but Ivan Lendl would have lost coming to net on every point. So copying other humans don't even work for humans!!! Don > Álvaro. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Computer-go mailing list > [email protected] > http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go >
_______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
