> > I can't find the word "local" in the paper. Can you find the statement > you're referring to? >
My mistake. In 4.1 it says, "Moves were only considered if they were on the 3rd or 4th line or were within a large knight’s move of an existing stone." I misread "existing" as "previous" somehow.
_______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
