> > Using an improvement of 70 ELO per doubling of speed [1], we get a > [...] > [1] The most commonly accepted figure. Unfortunately it affects the > results quite a bit. Putting different magic numbers won't affect the > conclusion that software matters, though. > > This improvement per doubling speed is interesting to me... it was claimed in the early times of MCTS that the winning rate with 2N simulations against N simulations was roughly constant, and then various studies (even in the best case, i.e. for a program against itself!) have shown that this does not hold, by far.
Any comment on the corresponding phenomenon in chess ?
_______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
