On 30-01-18 02:50, Brian Lee wrote: > We're not aiming for a top-level Go AI; we're merely aiming for a > correct, very readable implementation of the AlphaGoZero algorithm
I had a look around to see how you resolved what I'd consider the ambiguities in the original paper: https://github.com/gcp/leela-zero/issues/785 > Of course, in the end, strength is the best way to tell that your > implementation is correct :) In other words, do not take "correct" as necessarily meaning "matching the published research". -- GCP _______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@computer-go.org http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
