>I was thinking about this development and what it may mean from the point of view of a more general AI. >I daresay the next experiment would be to have just one neural net playing the >three games, right? >To my understanding we still have three instances of the same *methodology* but not yet a single one playing different games.
Deepmind did some research on that topic with the atari games: https://deepmind.com/blog/enabling-continual-learning-in-neural-networks/ and yes what you describe would be a more general AI but it would be more interesting to include all 48 atari games from previous research as well, although i suspect a real general AI will be developed from a different line of research as for what Deepmind will be researching, always a guess but i think we will hear more about tabula rasa stuff since several real world problems like the salesman problem <http://www.diego-perez.net/papers/MCTS_PTSP.pdf> have been adapted to be solved with mcts. But we will have to wait for their next paper/blog to know for sure. On 19 December 2017 at 16:15, Fidel Santiago <pperez...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I was thinking about this development and what it may mean from the point > of view of a more general AI. I daresay the next experiment would be to > have just one neural net playing the three games, right? To my > understanding we still have three instances of the same *methodology* but > not yet a single one playing different games. > > Best regards, > > Fidel Santiago. > > _______________________________________________ > Computer-go mailing list > Computer-go@computer-go.org > http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go >
_______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@computer-go.org http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
