Variations drawn from AlphaGo are usually indicated in the English translation by phrases such as "AlphaGo believes...", or reactions such as the pros' "approval" or "doubt" as mentioned by Steven. Some variations were also created by Fan Hui, Gu Li, and Zhou Ruiyang in order to investigate, explain, or clarify a given position, and these may or may not have been fully explored by AlphaGo.
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 4:18 PM Steven Clark <steven.p.cl...@gmail.com> wrote: > My interpretation is that all variations are from AlphaGo, whereas the > human pros are just weighing in on those. Hence you will see the pros > "approve of this variation" or "express doubts" about it. > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Darren Cook <dar...@dcook.org> wrote: > >> > DeepMind published AlphaGo's selfplay 3 games with comment. >> >> I've just been playing through the AlphaGo-Lee first game. When it shows >> a variation, is this what AlphaGo was expecting, i.e. its prime >> variation? Or is the follow-up "just" the opinion of the pro commentators? >> >> (E.g. game 1, move 13, the keima; the commentary says "While will >> attach..." Can I read that as meaning this is the move AlphaGo would >> have chosen if black had played there?) >> >> Thanks, >> Darren >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Computer-go mailing list >> Computer-go@computer-go.org >> http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go >> > > _______________________________________________ > Computer-go mailing list > Computer-go@computer-go.org > http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
_______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@computer-go.org http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
