On 09-05-16 16:04, "Ingo Althöfer" wrote: > Another point for discussion: > Although there were only six participants they split in > at least 4 classes, seperated by large gaps in strength: > Zen >> abakus, HiraBot >> LeelaBot >> Imrsel, matilda > Perhaps it makes really sense to think about a tournament > with handicaps.
The first obvious question is then: how will you determine the handicaps? As to the "large gaps in strength": the actual rating of Zen is 1 stone above abakus, which is 1 stone above HiraBot. That seems to conflict with your classification. I am not sure it's possible to draw these conclusions by observing <= 3 games from every matchup. -- GCP _______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@computer-go.org http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
