Hi Aja, >> ... i think many people really waiting for any news/plans for AlphaGo. >> Unfortunately, nothing has been given :-( > > Hi Paweł, we are still discussing and deciding the next steps of AlphaGo. > Thank you for the patience. I am one of those who are waiting eagerly for your comments on the games.
In particular, concerning game 1, Lee Sedol made a comment which I do not understand: > The right side white 1 (R10, 102nd move), which is often denoted as AlphaGo’s > winning move, proves that the match had become a tough game. It seems that > AlphaGo plays a bold move like this because she judges that she could not > win in a peaceful way. Is 102.R10 really so special? I analysed that position with CrazyStone2013 about 30 times (independent runs). In 20+ % of the runs, CS2013 also wants to play R12 (giving White 60+% chances of winning). But also in the other cases, where mostly R14 or P17 are proposed, the expected winning chances for White are given by about 60 %. I would indeed like to know which % AlphaGo gave White in this position. Kind regards, Ingo. _______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@computer-go.org http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
