another interesting question is to judge the bot's strength
by watching the facial gestures and body language of Lee Sedol
with each move...

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Álvaro Begué <alvaro.be...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Nick Wedd <mapr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 22 March 2016 at 17:20, Álvaro Begué <alvaro.be...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> A very simple-minded analysis is that, if the null hypothesis is that
>>> AlphaGo and Lee Sedol are equally strong, AlphaGo would do as well as we
>>> observed or better 15.625% of the time. That's a p-value that even social
>>> scientists don't get excited about. :)
>>>
>>>
>> "For "as well ... or better", I make it 18.75%.
>>
>
> I obviously can't count. :)
>
> Thanks for the correction.
>
> Álvaro.
>
>
>
>
>>
>> Nick
>>
>>
>>
>>> Álvaro.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Jason House <
>>> jason.james.ho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Statistical significance requires a null hypothesis... I think it's
>>>> probably easiest to ask the question of if I assume an ELO difference of x,
>>>> how likely it's a 4-1 result?
>>>> Turns out that 220 to 270 ELO has a 41% chance of that result.
>>>> >= 10% is -50 to 670 ELO
>>>> >= 1% is -250 to 1190 ELO
>>>> My numbers may be slightly off from eyeballing things in a simple excel
>>>> sheet. The idea and ranges should be clear though
>>>> On Mar 22, 2016 12:00 PM, "Lucas, Simon M" <s...@essex.ac.uk> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I was discussing the results with a colleague outside
>>>>> of the Game AI area the other day when he raised
>>>>> the question (which applies to nearly all sporting events,
>>>>> given the small sample size involved)
>>>>> of statistical significance - suggesting that on another week
>>>>> the result might have been 4-1 to Lee Sedol.
>>>>>
>>>>> I pointed out that in games of skill there's much more to judge than
>>>>> just the final
>>>>> outcome of each game, but wondered if anyone had any better (or worse
>>>>> :)
>>>>> arguments - or had even engaged in the same type of
>>>>> conversation.
>>>>>
>>>>> With AlphaGo winning 4 games to 1, from a simplistic
>>>>> stats point of view (with the prior assumption of a fair
>>>>> coin toss) you'd not be able to claim much statistical
>>>>> significance, yet most (me included) believe that
>>>>> AlphaGo is a genuinely better Go player than Lee Sedol.
>>>>>
>>>>> From a stats viewpoint you can use this approach:
>>>>> http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/itprnn/book.pdf
>>>>> (see section 3.2 on page 51)
>>>>>
>>>>> but given even priors it won't tell you much.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone know any good references for refuting this
>>>>> type of argument - the fact is of course that a game of Go
>>>>> is nothing like a coin toss.  Games of skill tend to base their
>>>>> outcomes on the result of many (in the case of Go many hundreds of)
>>>>> individual actions.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best wishes,
>>>>>
>>>>>   Simon
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Computer-go mailing list
>>>>> Computer-go@computer-go.org
>>>>> http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Computer-go mailing list
>>>> Computer-go@computer-go.org
>>>> http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Computer-go mailing list
>>> Computer-go@computer-go.org
>>> http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Nick Wedd      mapr...@gmail.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Computer-go mailing list
>> Computer-go@computer-go.org
>> http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Computer-go mailing list
> Computer-go@computer-go.org
> http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
>



-- 
Ryan B Hayward
Professor and Director (Outreach+Diversity)
Computing Science,  UAlberta
_______________________________________________
Computer-go mailing list
Computer-go@computer-go.org
http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go

Reply via email to