Wow - didn't expect that. Congratulations to the AlphaGo team! Ingo wrote: > Similar with CrazyStone. After move 26 CS gave 56 % for AlphaGo > and never went below this value. Soon later it were 60+ %, and > never went lower, too.
Did it show jumps at some of the key moves the human experts thought were decisive? (E.g. white 80, then 84-88 as poor, then either black 119 or black 123 as the losing move): https://gogameguru.com/alphago-defeats-lee-sedol-game-1/ (I guess the "reversal" at white 136 was just an MCTS program knowing it is ahead, and playing for probability, not winning margin.) I.e. is it fair to say that other computer programs will appreciate and understand the computer's moves better than the human's moves, so saying it is ahead is to be expected? (confirmation bias) Darren P.S. Lee Sedol says he was shocked, and never expected to lose, even when he was behind. I wonder if he did any special preparation for this match? (E.g. playing handicap games against other strong MCTS program, to appreciate how they behave when they have a lead.) _______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@computer-go.org http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
