What? You have mixed up things. http://www.europeangodatabase.eu/EGD/Player_Card.php?&key=17374016
2016-02-02 20:21 GMT+01:00 Olivier Teytaud <olivier.teyt...@inria.fr>: >>> If AlphaGo had lost at least one game, I'd understand how people can have >>> an upper bound on its level, but with 5-0 (except for Blitz) it's hard to >>> have an upper bound on his level. After all, AlphaGo might just have played >>> well enough for crushing Fan Hui, and a weak move while the position is >>> still in favor of AlphaGo is not really a weak move (at least in a >>> game-theoretic point of view...). >> >> >> I just want to point that according to Myungwan Kim 9p (video referenced >> in this thread) on the first game, Alpha Go did some mistake early in the >> game and was behind during nearly the whole game so some of his moves should >> be weak in game-theoric point of view. > > > Thanks, this point is interesting - that's really an argument limiting the > strength of AlphaGo. > > On the other hand, they have super strong people in the team (at the pro > level, maybe ? if Aja has pro level...), > and one of the guys said he is "quietly confident", which suggests they have > strong reasons for believing they have a big chance :-) > > Good luck AlphaGo :-) I'm grateful because since this happened many more > doors are opened for people > working with these tools, even if they don't touch games, and this is really > useful for the world :-) > > > > -- > ========================================================= > "I will never sign a document with logos in black & white." A. Einstein > Olivier Teytaud, olivier.teyt...@inria.fr, http://www.slideshare.net/teytaud > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Computer-go mailing list > Computer-go@computer-go.org > http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go _______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@computer-go.org http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
