I can offer you a factor of 2 speedup... s. On Mar 28, 2015 7:59 PM, "hughperkins2" <hughperki...@gmail.com> wrote:
> By the way, for mcts you dont need time controls. Each move takes the same > amount of time, since you just do n playouts, and choose n as you like. > > I think my playouts took 2s, which was enoufht for 40000 playouts i > suppose, but it was in novemebr, dont remember clearly... It was obvious > that adding more playouts didnt increase the strength libearly, more like > logarithmically, or, at best as the square root, and i dont want to program > heursitics by hand, not going to get a papet out of that :-) > > The atari paper looks interesting. Kind of dabbling in that a bit... By > the way, for mcts you dont need time controls. Each move takes the same > amount of time, since you just do n playouts, and choose n as you like. > > I think my playouts took 2s, which was enoufht for 40000 playouts i > suppose, but it was in novemebr, dont remember clearly... It was obvious > that adding more playouts didnt increase the strength libearly, more like > logarithmically, or, at best as the square root, and i dont want to program > heursitics by hand, not going to get a papet out of that :- out of that :-) > > The atari paper looks interesting. Kind of dabbling in that a bit... > > _______________________________________________ > Computer-go mailing list > Computer-go@computer-go.org > http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go >
_______________________________________________ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@computer-go.org http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
