On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 05:19:01AM -0800, Peter Drake wrote:
> On Nov 20, 2009, at 12:08 AM, Petr Baudis wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 07:03:56PM -0800, Seth Pellegrino wrote:
> >>* I've already got a stable base that I'm working from (specifically,
> >>Peter Drake's Orego[1]).
> >
> > (You could also choose a better base to work from,
> >e.g. libego, Pachi or Fuego, but maybe you are expected to use Orego
> >for your project. ;-)
>
> In my defense (and Orego's), the speeds Seth has reported are not
> representative. With light playouts, running 4 threads on a 4-core,
> 3 GHz machine, Orego gets about 50 kpps on 9x9, about 16 on 19x19.
> (Of course, it's somewhat slower with heavy playouts, but not THAT
> bad!)
>
> If I only run playouts (no tree), I can get those up to 35 and 8
> kpps with a single thread.
Thank you, that's good to know then. :) Sorry that I assumed this is
Orego's general speed.
P.S.: So this also gives a good idea about speeds possible in java
implementation (i.e. quite reasonable speeds).
Petr "Pasky" Baudis
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
