Orego thinks it's probably a win for O (around 60%, with a lot of
variance from one run to another).
On most runs, almost all of the playouts are discarded, because they
get caught in cycles and hit the maximum playout length limit.
Following LibEGO, Orego doesn't check for superko during playouts,
just simple ko.
Do other programs handle this issue differently?
Peter Drake
http://www.lclark.edu/~drake/
On Aug 5, 2009, at 2:20 PM, Brian Sheppard wrote:
I analyzed the following position as a win for O, but there are
two or three kos involved (A1/A2, H1/G1, and the bent four at J9),
so I am wondering if there are any other opinions.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
A X - X X - X X X -
B O X X O X - X O O
C - O O O X X O O O
D O O X - X O O O -
E X O - X X X O - O
F - O X X O O O O X
G - O X O O O O X X
H O X X O O X X X -
J - X X X O X - - -
O to play
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/