I had never considered using AMAF with larger pattern. That's an interesting idea. Perhaps a 5-vertex cross-shaped pattern or a 3x3 pattern. Has anyone tried this?

Magnus Persson wrote:
Probably 1x1 patterns implies that different priorities are assigned to the absolute position of empty moves. AMAF can be seen this way. AMAF learns statistics of 1x1 patterns if the move is played in the playout but ignores all information surrounding the move at the time it is played. Another example would be to have lower priorities for the moves at the first and second line.

-Magnus

Quoting Peter Drake <dr...@lclark.edu>:

I've seen reference in some papers to 1x1 patterns. What does that even
mean? A point is either black, white, or vacant, and it's illegal to
play there unless it's vacant.

_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/


_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

Reply via email to