Is there a rating drift? I remember that pure UCT no RAVE with 100k playouts got over 1700 elo. I will try to run it today again.
Lukasz 2009/4/20 Jason House <jason.james.ho...@gmail.com>: > I've started two bots: hb797-10k and hb797-50k > They are pure UCT+RAVE with light playouts, one search thread, and no > pondering. > The number at the end represents the playouts per move. > > I forget the approximate ratings for each version. I'll guess 1200-1300 for > 10k and 1500-1600 for 50k. > I messed up the first round and both bots lost on time due to no internet > connection. > Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 17, 2009, at 4:49 PM, Jason House <jason.james.ho...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I can run my bot (1600-1700 ELO), but I may a few days depending on free > time over the weekend. > > Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 17, 2009, at 4:23 PM, "Brian Sheppard" <sheppar...@aol.com> wrote: > > There are actually very few programs playing on CGOS (9x9). My engine is > rated around 1000, which means that it plays 75% of its games against > AverageLib (rating 670), and occasional games against Aya (rating 2300). All > games have the predictable result, so I haven't been learning much lately. > > I saw on Sensei's Library page http://senseis.xmp.net/?CGOSBasicUCTBots that > there are a range of basic UCT implementations that would be excellent > opponents (rating 1171 through 1603), but I haven't seen these players in > weeks. Is it possible to get them back up? > > If so, I would deeply appreciate it. > > Thanks, > Brian > > > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > computer-go@computer-go.org > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ > > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > computer-go@computer-go.org > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ > _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
