lockless hash table references. essential. On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Rémi Coulom <remi.cou...@univ-lille3.fr> wrote: > Michael Williams wrote: >> >> What tricks are people doing to minimize the performance degradation due >> to multiple threads contending for access to the tree (in MCTS)? Do you >> only lock a portion of the tree? How would that work? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> computer-go mailing list >> computer-go@computer-go.org >> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ > > If you are motivated, you can try a completely lockless solution: > http://computer-go.org/pipermail/computer-go/2008-March/014537.html > It scales well up to 16 cores: > http://computer-go.org/pipermail/computer-go/2008-March/014547.html > > Using a single global lock is really very inefficient, especially for 9x9 or > if you have many cores. > > Rémi > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > computer-go@computer-go.org > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ >
-- - Ryan _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
