Hopefully you will be proved wrong by the end of January 2009.
I don't feel like i should involve anyone in this before a working prototype is
out. Your skepticism is probably statistically correct, so we'll resume this
conversation in two month. If my algorithm doesn't work indeed, i'll certainly
stop all work on go and hex altogether.
Sincerely
Denis FIDAALI.
> Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 01:57:55 -0800
> To: computer-go@computer-go.org
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [computer-go] RE: hex robot
>
>
> Permit me to play the skeptic here; I think you're going about it absolutely
> backwards - unless you already have a strong algorithm which depends on 128
> bit rotations, and only lack an efficient hardware engine to run it on.
>
> If your idea of fun is to really feel the bits squishing between your toes,
> by all means do, but I don't think it's likely you will simultaneously make
> advances in Hex theory or practice.
>
>
> At 12:19 AM 11/27/2008, Denis fidaali wrote:
>
>
> > My current plan is to tackle directly the power of x86-64bits architecture.
> > Because it's now quite well represented. And there is this "larrabee"
> > project that may get out in one or two years (48 x86-64bits processors). So
> > my true goal is to try and see what i can do with my quad Q9300 2.5Ghz
> > running a 64 bits linux. Obviously one need a bit of work before being able
> > to hope to achieve something with assembly.
>
> etc...
>
> _______________________________________________
> computer-go mailing list
> computer-go@computer-go.org
> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
_________________________________________________________________
Inédit ! Des Emoticônes Déjantées! Installez les dans votre Messenger !
http://www.ilovemessenger.fr/Emoticones/EmoticonesDejantees.aspx
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
