Well, the reason for moving off Subversion (potentially) was that I found it too slow to have my repository online. I can use mirroring, which may be the best option for now, but if possible I'd prefer it to be set up so that others can make changes as well.
The only Eclipse plugin I found for git (and I did look around) seems to be an abandoned project. So that doesn't instill any confidence at all that the situation will improve any time soon. I feel I have better things to do with my scarce time than figuring out complicated install procedures, so if I don't find anything easy to replace Subversion I'll stick to that. Mark On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 6:30 PM, Jim O'Flaherty, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mark, > > I would figure that given the popularity of both Eclipse and git, the > problems connecting the two easily, similar to the way Eclipse and > Subversion connect, will be solved sooner rather than later. And once they > are, it won't be too difficult to transition from whatever you choose to use > in the interim. It's not like the core "framework" project is going to have > a ton of supported branches or even contributors, right? > > BTW, I don't recall why you were moving off of Subversion. Why not stay > there for the interim unless you have lots of coders who will be working on > the framework (as opposed to being a client using the framework .jar-s). I > figure the JAGS framework would only have a couple of contributors. It's the > clients of the framework who want to experiment with the least investment in > "install, set up and indefinitely tinker" who will gain advantage. And they > don't need version control at all. Almost all of them will just be consuming > the framework .jar-s and likely doing the development alone. And for those > who are part of a team (or are just have to work with a one), they will be > choosing their own VCS completely decoupled from the choices around the > development of the JAGS framework. > > > Jim > > > ________________________________ > From: Mark Boon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: computer-go <computer-go@computer-go.org> > Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 3:13:09 PM > Subject: Re: [computer-go] Git, any other ideas? > > > On 24-okt-08, at 16:15, Zach Wegner wrote: > >> Use git anyways ;) I don't use an IDE, but git works great for me from >> the command line. After I realized that "git" in pkgsrc was actually >> GNU Interactive Tools and not git, it took me just a few minutes to >> set up. The basic commands are really easy to learn, especially if you >> are familiar with CVS/SVN. There are also separate GUI frontends for >> git, so that might be an option worth looking at. >> > > Over my dead body :) > > If I don't get similar integration in Eclipse as Subversion I'm not > interested. > > Now trying Mercurial. Also problems there, as it complains about some > python library. At least the Eclipse plugin installed without a hitch. > > Mark > > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > computer-go@computer-go.org > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ > > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > computer-go@computer-go.org > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ > _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
