Hi, On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 02:51, Claus Reinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, once you've got your representations (sets/bitmaps, arrays/hashtables, > etc.) implemented in libraries, the programming language itself may not > matter much any more (recursion simplifies things, but whether one > recursively collects sets of liberties in imperative, functional, logic, or > object-oriented code may not make much difference - even > assembler might be manageable, given such libraries, just that it might > doom your code when you move to a different machine in future).
Good points (even those I didn't quote). I'd just like to point out that once the representations and libraries above are implemented, one effectively has implemented a go-specific language! One could in principle give it a concrete syntax different than the one of the host language, but it's not certain it would be worth it. best regards, Vlad _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
