On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 14:35 +0200, Denis fidaali wrote: > hi, > Thanks Dave Hillis for this quick response. (And by the way, thanks to Remy > Coulomb for a previous response he made a while ago. I just though that post > containing only thanks would be noise to most people there ...) > > To Don and Christoph : I reallize that i was probably not as clear as i > though i was.
I think I understood. So far your program only does play-outs and does not have game playing code. However, your light play-outs are just one short step away from being a simple MC bot. Just as a suggestion, you might as well put in the infrastructure for GTP and simple game logic so that you have reference bots. > I have built up a light simulator. There are no tree involved. It is only > choosing a move with equiprobabilty from the set of empty points on the board. > If the move is not valid, it just choose another one. If it's a "pseudo eye" > then it again chooses another point. Whenever no point can be validly chosen, > it just pass. Whenever two consecutives pass occurs, the simulation end. > > Now, i wanted to make sure that my implementation had any chances to be > correct. So i though I'd post the characteristic statistical values that i > get out of it. Indeed i though it could benefits others later on, in > particular if someone could corroborate them :) > > > So here is another set of Values. It is the all-move-as-first score from an > empty board for black stones (black plays first in my simulations). It gives > the probability of black wining the game (while playing randomly), if he has > played an intersection before white during the simulation. > ,0566 means 0.566 chances out of 1 that a game where black has played there > is a win for black. Do you mean "black is the first player to move to this point?" or do you mean, black at some point in the game moved there? (I'm not sure it would be much different, but it should be checked.) > > Could anyone once again confirm that those results sounds correct ? They look roughly correct at first glance - but I have run this. If I get a chance I will try to verify. - Don > > > mean score =2.1726424464558005 > 79655.5328628921 Playout/sec > Time=12.563621936 > Number of playout=1000762.0 > Mean moves per sim 111.06333373969035 > > Amaf Result : (from empty board, black plays first) > ||,490||,507||,506||,511||,514||,511||,506||,507||,490 > ||,507||,524||,533||,539||,541||,539||,533||,524||,507 > ||,506||,534||,544||,550||,553||,551||,544||,533||,505 > ||,511||,539||,550||,558||,561||,558||,551||,539||,511 > ||,513||,541||,553||,562||,566||,560||,552||,541||,513 > ||,511||,539||,550||,558||,560||,558||,550||,539||,511 > ||,507||,532||,544||,551||,552||,550||,544||,532||,506 > ||,507||,523||,534||,538||,541||,538||,532||,523||,507 > ||,491||,507||,505||,512||,513||,511||,506||,507||,492 > > > PS : how can i do so that my response to this mailing-list will be correctly > indented ? (for example i would have liked to set this one as a response to > my previous post). > _________________________________________________________________ > Email envoyé avec Windows Live Hotmail. Dites adieux aux spam et virus, > passez à Hotmail ! C'est gratuit ! > http://www.windowslive.fr/hotmail/default.asp_______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > computer-go@computer-go.org > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
