Hi Bob,
No problem at all ... it was inevitable that this would happen. I just
found that the Oregonian, which printed that I wrote GNU Go, properly
changed it to SlugGo in the on line version.
What I am trying to understand now is how the New Scientist technology
blog has me properly quoted saying things that Chris did not print ...
I was unaware of any other reporters nearby when I sad those things!
Cheers,
David
On 12, Aug 2008, at 3:34 PM, Bob Hearn wrote:
Well you can blame me for linking to the AGA story on Slashdot, but
at least I didn't repeat the misquote, and I also asked Chris to fix
it on the AGA site. I figured it would probably make Slashdot
quickly anyway, so the story might as well be written by someone
with at least a bit of a clue.
Bob
On Aug 12, 2008, at 1:23 PM, David Doshay wrote:
I had asked Chris to print the correction, and he was glad to do
so. Now I am trying to get the article on the AGA web site updated.
I have already seen a bunch of things on the internet that link to
it and the mistaken comment (9 stones in a year, computer
superiority real soon) is getting repeated a huge number of times.
Cheers,
David
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
