Don Dailey wrote:
First of all, I am not aware of any published work on this specific
thing. There may be some, but I'm not aware of it.
Thanks, this was what I was curious about.
The rest of your story is rather anecdotal and I won't comment on it.
Note that I agree on the starting premise and by extension the result
from the "light" study is the one I most expected. I was surprised by
the original Mogo-Leela result but the "light" result seems to show it
was a bit of a coincidence.
So in the early days it seemed more productive to make your program
faster - but now it's more productive to make them smarter. I
believe that if you ask any computer chess programmer that has been
doing this for 20 years or more, you would get this same
understanding.
I think it depends on how you define "smarter". Is that like "more
intelligent" ?
--
GCP
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
