If someone will check out the old perl version and bring it up to date if needed, I will post it on the web page.
- Don Álvaro Begué wrote: > On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Raymond Wold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > >> Don Dailey wrote: >> >>> No. cgos does not use GTP protocol for communicating with server. >>> Also, I have eventual plans to extend what is communicated to the >>> client and this is not compatible with the current GTP set. >>> >> The more you add as requirements on the client side, the more those bot >> coders who can't or don't want to run third party interface code will >> have to implement. >> >> Christoph Birk wrote: >> >>> That's similar to what I did. I implemented the CGOS protocol >>> directly into my Go-programm. It's very straight forward and I don't >>> have to run a separate client that way. >>> >>> Christoph >>> >> It would be a lot more straight forward if there was just /one/ protocol >> to implement. But I guess it's true what they say about standards being >> nice. >> > > > In case anyone didn't understand this, I think Don is talking about an old > joke said: "Standards are great, that's why everyone has one." > > I like the current scheme where a little program talks GTP to the engine and > then something else (I don't care what) to the server. It would be better if > the little client were written in Perl (there used to be a Perl version but > I don't know if it's up to date) so I wouldn't have to install another > interpreter (TCL). > > Álvaro. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > computer-go@computer-go.org > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
_______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
