Let's make a wild guess. What if I made the web site report
approximate strength using the following formula:
dan = (elo - 2300) / 100
So a 2400 player is 1 dan, a 2500 player is 2 dan etc.
Here is a table:
2300 - 1.0 kyu
2310 - 0.9 kyu
2320 - 0.8 kyu
...
2400 - 1.0 dan
2410 - 1.1 dan
Does this scale and these constants seem reasonable? Am I off a class
in either direction?
note: this is only to estimate the playing strength relative to a 19x19
player since there is no real system that makes sense for 9x9. I
would simple put this on the crosstable web pages in parenthesis. e.g.
Rated: 2410 (1.1d est.)
- Don
Christoph Birk wrote:
> Robert Jasiek wrote:
>>> Where can one play the latest versions of MoGo or other, similarly
>>> strong programs?
>
> Would it be possible to publish the MonteGNU code?
> If yes, then a few dan-players could play each at least 20 games
> against it and publish their results. That would allow for a
> rough estimate of MonteGNU's strength (9x9 CGOS = 2100 ELO)
> and a (first) normalization point for CGOS.
>
> Christoph
>
> _______________________________________________
> computer-go mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
>
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
