i think that it's an accurate statement. it certainly hasn't already played such a role, and there is no evidence that it will or can.
s. ----- Original Message ---- From: Chris Fant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: computer-go <computer-go@computer-go.org> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 9:15:18 PM Subject: Re: [computer-go] Former Deep Blue Research working on Go I'm just now reading the article. "Monte Carlo techniques have recently had success in Go played on a restricted 9-by-9 board. My hunch, however, is that they won't play a significant role in creating a machine that can top the best human players in the 19-by-19 game." The author loses credibility with this statement. On 10/10/07, Ray Tayek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 02:33 PM 10/7/2007, you wrote: > >Found this link and thought you all might find it interesting. > > > >http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/oct07/5552 > > thread on slashdot: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/10/10/1758244 > > > --- > vice-chair http://ocjug.org/ > > > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > computer-go@computer-go.org > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ > _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ ____________________________________________________________________________________ Catch up on fall's hot new shows on Yahoo! TV. Watch previews, get listings, and more! http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/3658 _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
