I thought it was an interesting article, full of gems and annoyances. I couldn't help to get the feeling the author was poking fun at Kasparov at times.
Despite that, I am curious to see what kind of hardware he and his students produce. Guess if there is going to be a Deep Go he'd be the one to design it. Should make for some interesting progress in our field. -Josh On 10/7/07, Benjamin Teuber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quite interesting, but after all, it completely neglects the difficulties to > a) determine the life status of groups > b) build an evaluation function out of this > > Benjamin > > Joshua Shriver schrieb: > > Found this link and thought you all might find it interesting. > > > > http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/oct07/5552 > > > > Interesting part for me so far: > > > > " At my lab at Microsoft Research Asia, in Beijing, I am organizing a > > graduate student project to design the hardware and software elements > > that will test the ideas outlined here. If they prove out, then the > > way will be clear for a full-scale project to dethrone the best human > > players." > > > > Thoughts, comments? > > > > Deep Go anyone? > > -Josh > > _______________________________________________ > > computer-go mailing list > > computer-go@computer-go.org > > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > computer-go@computer-go.org > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ > _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
