i don't mean necessarily that it isn't stronger, just that now is the time to not worry so much about things.
if anything, try to make it even stronger! you've got another 1200 ELO to go, after all. s. ----- Original Message ---- From: Jason House <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: computer-go <computer-go@computer-go.org> Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2007 10:44:55 AM Subject: Re: [computer-go] ego110_allfirst on CGOS Statistically speaking, I can say with 99.9% confidence that hb-amaf-1k-v2 is stronger than genAnchor-1k. No need to wait any longer to conclude that :) The math to compute the one-tailed p-value for rejecting the null hypothesis that the bots are the same strength is left as an exercise for the reader ;) On Sat, 2007-09-29 at 07:20 -0700, steve uurtamo wrote: > > Strangely enough, it now appears that hb-amaf-1k-v2 is significantly > > stronger than genAnchor-1k, defeating it 9 out of 9 times. I still have > > to wonder what the cause of the strength difference is. > > now is the time to just let it run for a few weeks and check on the > stats later. > > s. > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Tonight's top picks. What will you watch tonight? Preview the hottest shows > on Yahoo! TV. > http://tv.yahoo.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > computer-go@computer-go.org > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ ____________________________________________________________________________________ Catch up on fall's hot new shows on Yahoo! TV. Watch previews, get listings, and more! http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/3658 _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
